Walker has been accused of repeatedly threatening his ex-wife’s life, exaggerating claims of financial success and overstating his role in a for-profit program that is alleged to have preyed upon veterans and service members while defrauding the government.Įarlier this year, after a story by The Daily Beast, Walker acknowledged the existence of three children he had not previously talked about publicly. It adds to a series of stories about the football legend's past that have shaken Walker's campaign. Raphael Warnock are locked in a tight contest that is key to the balance of power in the U.S. The latest reporting ensures that abortion will continue to be a central issue in the Georgia race, one of the most competitive Senate contests in the country. Walker is scheduled to make a public appearance Thursday morning in Wadley, Georgia, as part of his Unite Georgia Bus Stop tour across the state. The Daily Beast said the Walker campaign declined to comment on Wednesday's story. She decided to continue on with the later pregnancy, though she noted that Walker, as he had during the earlier pregnancy, expressed that it wasn't a convenient time for him, the outlet reported. So on Wednesday night, The Daily Beast revealed that the woman - who was not named - was so well known to Walker that, according to her, they conceived another child years after the abortion. But Walker, who has expressed support for a national abortion ban without exceptions, vehemently denied the story, calling the abortion allegation a “flat-out lie,” threatening a lawsuit against the outlet he has yet to file and saying he had no idea who the woman might be. The Daily Beast, which first reported Monday on the abortion, said it had agreed not to reveal details of the woman's identity to protect her privacy. ATLANTA - (AP) - A woman who said Herschel Walker paid for her 2009 abortion is the mother of one of his children, according to a new report Wednesday, undercutting the Georgia Republican Senate candidate's claims that he didn't know who she was.
0 kommentar(er)
